Opposing Elements of Grant and Lee in American Life

Catton (1956) describes each according to the set and principles that characterized twain them and their regions. Lee, a landed aristocrat, characterized the European elements of American society. This include country squires, knighthood, chivalry, and the belief that the land should be the chief solution of wealth and power. As Catton (1956, p. 224) writes, "Lee embodied the noblest elements of the aristocratic ideal." In his view, the landed class of society would powerfully take flush of the community due very much to the obligation of universe "privileged" (Catton, 1956, p. 224). In contrast, Grant stood for democracy, equality, and the freedom for any world of any class to have the ability to compete and succeed.

s Catton (1956, p.

224) forms and traditions meant little to nothing to this lovely of man and the men of his region, and certainly not privileged classes, "No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a befall to show how far he could rise."

I thought I would find myself siding with the pictorial matter of Grant, being as I believed he supported equality and democracy. However, the portrayal of Lee is slightly crafted by Catton in ways that made me believe both men were good, strong men whose beliefs differed to the degree that the North differed from the southbound at this point in American history. As such, Catton's (1956) depiction of their similarities (tenacity, fidelity, daring, resourcefulness, etc.) made me believe each man thought, at least in principle, he was f
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.