Leadership

Running head: MAJOR DEPRESSION ARE WE LOST

study(ip) Depression are we Lost in Screening and interference
NURS4386 leaders in Nursing

Cee
June 10, 2008

Part I: Action Plan
1) Project taper: Major depression- screening and treatment
2) Documenting Evidence:
a. Questions to be considered within the evidence-based coiffure process. Within the initial year following diagnosis, will individuals cardinal and above who has been diagnosis with major depression improve from screening and treatment compared to clients without proper screening, treatment and fulfill.

i. P (Patient Population of Interest): ages cardinal and above
ii. I (Intervention of Interest): Improve screening and treatment procedures
iii. C (Comparison of Interest): Versus clients without screening and treatment for depression
iv. O (Outcome of Interest): Improvement of screening and treatment of major depression upon diagnosis with the use of algorithms
v. T (Time): Short shape to long term endeavor
b.



Evidence
Articles
(Reference Required)
|Who
Involved |What
occurred |Where
completed |When |Why |How |Consistencies |Gaps | |Silverman.A.G. (2004). Treatment Strategies of Screening for Depression in Primary Care. Department of practice of medicine, UCLA retrieved June 10, 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol://www.med.ucla.edu/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=62 |Clients with depression |Factors involving missed diagnosis |UCLA Department of Medicine |1st study 2004 |Assure accurate
Diagnosis , treatment and follow-up for adults |Pilot project and parallel project |Shared science lab tests for efficient consults, referrals, and treatments |The article did not state the year or information of the parallel study | |Mulligan, K. (2005). Plan Points Physicians Toward Best Practices in Prescribing. Psychiatric News,...If you want to get a full essay, do it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .