`the Don`t-bother_to-knock Rule`

Running head : ETHICSEthicsClient s NameUniversity AffiliationEthicsThe respectable debate as to the propriety of euthanasia , which was earlier known to be the good terminal had been going on for a long time (MedicineNet , Inc , 2007 . The sophisticated concept of euthanasia now involves the participation of the physician in cutting short the implement of a terminally harm patient . Sometimes such presentions are not in time classified as euthanasia , but as a mere part of purpose making in the health care quite a littleting , more particularly in terminal fonts (MedicineNet , Inc , 2007 p The power described by Stengle is one such case , wherein pulling the plug or removal of a individual s life underpin system is seen as the only means to go (2006 . The terminal and hopeless medical case of Daniel Wayne Cullen II led the hospital s ethics shape up to decide against act life upholdIn this situation , the common debate would revolve close to two positions : Kantian and consequentialist ethics . Between these two ethical theories , the Kantian position is more in favor of life , and is more in accord with humanityKantian moral philosophy demands the conceptualization of the categorical imperative , which is the one moral principle that would eventually guide all of man s fills (The Internet encyclopaedia of school of thought , 2001 Kantian philosophy does not look at the consequences of the action , but at the reason behind it (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2001 .On the other hand , consequentialist philosophy , or utlitarianism gauges human action based on the happiness it brings or the pain it causes . Applied in the given situation , the special number of people to be served by a decision to continue life support would dictate action against it . On the other hand , removing life support could provide several(prenominal) benefits , such as lessened expenses and non-wastage of hospital resources and spaceHowever , it is better to act based on reason , and not based on the contingent allotment of happy feelings .

In the given situation , removing life support is approved because the ethics committee has set out standards to help them decide these kinds of situations . Thus , the ethics board had already determined medically that continued life support would be futile (Stengle , 2006The emotions of the mother would dictate that the consequences of the action be used as basis for decision-making , while the objective luff of view of the doctors dictates that the dilemma be resolved through sharp-witted weighing of benefits or outcomeThe latter course of action grass be formulated as a general run of action in all cases of similar premises . The action would be supported not by feelings and emotions , but by the acceptance that there is nothing in reason to support an action of continued life supportReferencesMedicineNet , Inc (2007 . Definition of Euthanasia . Retrieved October 10 , 2007 , from http /www .medterms .com /script /main /art .asp ? obligekey 7365Stengle , J (2006 . Mom Fights to Keep Baby on Life stake . The Christian Post . Retrieved October 10 , 2007 , from http /www .christianpost .com /article /22123...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .