Commonwealth V Golston

Javier Hipolito population v. Golston, 366 NE 2d 744 - Mass: Supreme reasoned Court 1977. About 2 P.M. on Sunday, August 24, 1975, the victim, a white man xxxiv years old, came out of a store in Dorchester and walked toward his car. Siegfried Golston, a black man of nineteen, walked cigarette him and hit him on the full stop with a baseball bat. The defendant then went into a building, changed his clothes, and vitiated through the street to the store, where he worked. When asked accordingly he had hit the man, he s countenance, For kicks. The victim was interpreted to a hospital. thither a large portion of the battlefront of his skull was outside to relieve blackjack on his reason, and he voiceless with the aid of an artificial respirator. by and by the victim died. Golston was charged with transfer in first degree. on that point was evidence of great and foreign emphasis in the act, which caused a 4 inch cut on the side of the skull. There is no requirement that the defendant know that his act was super atrocious or uncouth which meat he had no mens rea. When asked why he did it he give tongue to for kicks. He has actus reus because he hit the victim with a baseball bat.

The appellate court affirmed his conviction.  Among numerous separate errors, he claims that the expiration of the victim was not aright established. They said that the exam say correctly accepted the health check concept of brain expiration; alternatively, any error in this respect was blameless beyond a reasonable doubt. They similarly overrule the defendants other assignments of error. state of matter v. Pinnick, 354 Mass. 13, 15 n. 1 (1968).  body politic v. Vanetzian, 350 Mass. 491, 493 n. 1 (1966).Commonwealth v. Macloon,  one 100 one Mass. 1, 6 (1869). Commonwealth v. Parker, 2 Pick. 550, 558 (1824)If you want to cut a full essay, install it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.